Uso de Quinolonas como Factor de Riesgo para Infección Oportunista Severa por Cándida en Pacientes Adultos Críticamente Enfermos

Resumen Introducción: Candida es uno de los microorganismos mayormente aislado de los hemocultivos positivos, mostrando un aumento de su prevalencia a nivel mundial debido a múltiples factores de riesgo siendo unos de los más importantes el uso de antibioticoterapia de espectro ampliado, como las quinolonas usados en pacientes críticos hospitalizados en salas de cuidado intensivo, de los cuales la literatura es tangencial en su relación con el desarrollo de candidiasis invasiva. Materiales y metodos: se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en las bases de datos biomédicas MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Embase, utilizando la estrategia de búsqueda: "Candidemia AND Quinolones AND Adult" sin embargo también se usaron otras estrategias para aumentar la sensibilidad como: "Invasive candidiasis AND Quinolones" y "Candidemia OR Invasive candidiasis AND risk factors" incluyendo los idiomas inglés, español, francés y portugués, se tuvieron en cuenta artículos tipo: [Randomized Controlled Trial], [Clinical Trial], [Controlled Clinical Trial] y [Review] Resultados: la literatura biomédica es escasa en cuanto a la descripción de la relación entre el uso de quinolinas como factor de riesgo para desarrollar candidiasis invasiva, sin embargo se encontraron ocho estudios con significancia estadística importante que muestran una relación estrecha entre el fenómeno propuesto. Conclusiónes: Las quinolonas de uso sistémico como Ciprofloxacino, son un factor de riesgo confirmado asociado a infecciones invasivas por hongos tipo Candida.

Abstract Introduction: Candida is one of the microorganisms most frequently isolated from positive blood cultures, showing an increase in its prevalence worldwide due to multiple risk factors, one of the most important being the use of extended-spectrum antibiotic therapy, such as quinolones used in critical patients in intensive care wards, of which the literature is tangential in its relationship with the development of invasive candidiasis, Methods: a search of biomedical databases MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Embase, was performed using the search strategy: "Candidemia AND Quinolones AND Adult" other strategies were also used to increase sensitivity such as: "Invasive candidiasis AND Quinolones" and "Candidemia OR Invasive candidiasis AND risk factors" including English, Spanish, French and Portuguese languages, articles type were taken into account: [Randomized Controlled Trial], [Clinical Trial], [Controlled Clinical Trial] and [Review]. Results: The biomedical literature is scarce regarding the description of the relationship between the use of quinolones as a risk factor for developing invasive candidiasis; however, eight studies were found with important statistical significance that show a close relationship between the proposed phenomenon. Conclusion: Systemic quinolones such as Ciprofloxacin are a confirmed risk factor associated with invasive fungal infections such as Candida.

Infección invasiva por Candida spp. En pacientes inmunocomprometidos: Descripción de curso clínico experiencia diagnóstica, manejo y seguimiento en centro de alta complejidad / Invasive infection by Candida spp. in immunocompromised patients: A description of clinical, diagnostics, therapeutic and follow up experience in high complexity healthcare center

Introducción: Candida spp. Es la principal causa de fungemia, cuya incidencia ha aumentado en los últimos años. Existen datos locales insuficientes sobre este tipo de infecciones. Materiales y métodos: Este fue un estudio observacional retrospectivo de 44 pacientes diagnosticados con candidiasis invasiva hospitalizados en la Fundación Valle del Lili, el cual es un centro de cuarto nivel afiliado a la Universidad Icesi en el Suroccidente Colombiano, entre los años 2012 a 2017. Resultados: Se identificaron 44 pacientes con candidiasis invasiva, 27 de ellos mujeres (61%). La mediana de edad fue de 56 años (36 - 70). Más del 50% tenían una enfermedad crónica subyacente, uso de antibióticos (84%), catéter venoso central (80%), ventilación mecánica (68%) y nutrición enteral (66%) El 80% requirió manejo en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) donde debutaron con sepsis (68%) y falla respiratoria (61%). En el 90% de los casos se aisló alguna especie de Candida spp. A partir de hemocultivo y sólo al 22% se le realizó prueba de sensibilidad. El tratamiento de elección fue con fluconazol (80%), asociado a caspofungina (70%). La tasa de mortalidad fue del 49%, con una mediana de 33 (22-49,5) días desde el ingreso hasta el fallecimiento. C. albicans fue el principal microorganismo aislado. La resistencia a azoles en especies no albicans existe en nuestro medio. Conclusión: La candidiasis se presenta como candidemia asociada a infección bacteriana concomitante, que cobra mayor importancia en el contexto del paciente inmunosuprimido asociado a elevadas tasas de mortalidad.

Introduction: Candida spp. is the main cause of fungemia, whose incidence has increased in recent years. There are insufficient local data about this pathology. Materials and methods: This was an observational, retrospective chart review of 44 patients diagnosed with invasive candida who were hospitalized at Fundación Valle del Lili, which is a fourth level center affiliated to Icesi university between 2012 and 2017. Results: We identified 44 patients with invasive candidiasis, 27 of them women (61%). The median age was 56 years (36 - 70). More than 50% had an underlying chronic disease, use of antibiotics (84%), central venous catheter (80%), mechanical ventilation (68%) and enteral nutrition (66%). 80% required management in an intensive care unit. Sepsis (68%) and respiratory failure (61%) were the most common clinical presentation. Almost 90% of the cases, had positive blood cultures, but only 22% presented susceptibility tests. The treatment was mainly fluconazole (80%), associated with caspofungin (70%). The mortality rate was 49%, median of 33 (22-49.5) days from admission to death. Candida albicans was the main isolated organism. Azole resistance in non-albicans species was observed. Conclusion: Candidiasis presents as bacterial infection associated candidemia, which becomes more important in the context of the immunosuppressed patient with high mortality rates.

Candidemia en Colombia / Candidemia in Colombia

En Colombia, especialmente en las unidades de cuidados intensivos, la candidemia es una causa frecuente de infección del torrente sanguíneo y representa el 88 % de las infecciones fúngicas en pacientes hospitalizados, con una mortalidad entre 36 y 78 %. Su incidencia en Colombia es mayor a la reportada en los países desarrollados e, incluso, en otros países de Latinoamérica. Para su manejo deben considerarse los factores de riesgo del paciente, luego valorar las características clínicas y, finalmente, hacer los estudios microbiológicos y, si es necesario, pruebas moleculares. En general, las guías estadounidenses, latinoamericanas y europeas recomiendan las equinocandinas como el tratamiento de primera línea de la candidemia y difieren en el uso de fluconazol dependiendo de la 'evidencia', la gravedad de la enfermedad, la exposición previa a los azoles y la prevalencia de Candida no albicans. Dada su gran incidencia en nuestro país, asociada con una elevada mortalidad, esta infección debe buscarse sistemáticamente en pacientes con factores de riesgo, con el fin de iniciar oportunamente el tratamiento antifúngico.

In Colombia, especially in intensive care units, candidemia is a frequent cause of infection, accounting for 88% of fungal infections in hospitalized patients, with mortality ranging from 36% to 78%. Its incidence in Colombia is higher than that reported in developed countries and even higher than in other Latin American countries. First, the patient's risk factors should be considered, and then clinical characteristics should be assessed. Finally, microbiological studies are recommended and if the evidence supports its use, molecular testing. In general, American, Latin American, and European guides place the echinocandins as the first-line treatment for candidemia and differ in the use of fluconazole based on evidence, disease severity, previous exposure to azoles, and prevalence of Candida non-albicans. Taking into account the high incidence of this disease in our setting, it should be looked for in patients with risk factors to start a prompt empirical anti-fungal treatment.

Candidiasis invasiva en pacientes pediátricos ingresados / Invasive candidiasis in hospitalized pediatric patients

RESUMEN Introducción: la candidiasis es una infección fúngica causada principalmente por especies de candida no albicans que aparece generalmente en la piel o las membranas mucosas de los pacientes. Objetivos: caracterizar la incidencia de especies de candida con mayor número de aislamientos en los pacientes pediátricos hospitalizados, en el Hospital Mariana Grajales (Servicio de Neonatología) y Hospital José Luis Miranda, en el período 2013 - 2018, en Villa Clara. Métodos: estudio descriptivo y transversal con 50 aislamientos del género candida en hemocultivos de pacientes hospitalizados Hospital Mariana Grajales (Servicio de Neonatología) y Hospital José Luis Miranda (Servicio de Terapia Intensiva), Villa Clara, de enero 2013 - septiembre 2018. Se utilizó la estadística descriptiva e inferencial, mediante el test de Ji cuadrado de Pearson (x2) o el test exacto de Fisher a las variables: año de estudio, tipo de hospital, tipo de servicio y especie de candida aislada. Resultados: los mayores aislamientos de candidiasis invasiva correspondieron al pediátrico, en el servicio de Terapia Intensiva, 2018 (única con significación estadística).En esta misma unidad, el grupo de candida spp obtuvo el mayor índice, seguido de candida tropicalis, sin significaciones estadísticas. En el servicio de Neonatología el mayor número de aislamientos correspondió a candida spp, seguido de candida guillermondii, ambas sin significación estadística. Conclusiones: el servicio de Terapia Intensiva fue el que mayor número de casos de candidiasis invasiva y el año 2018 fue el más representativo. El grupo de candida spp fueron las especies que más se aislaron en ambos hospitales.

ABSTRACT Introduction: candidiasis is a fungal infection caused mainly by non-albicans Candida species that usually appears on the skin or mucous membranes of patients. Objective: to characterize the incidence of Candida species with the highest number of isolates in hospitalized pediatric patients, at Mariana Grajales Hospital (Neonatology Service) and José Luis Miranda Hospital, in the period 2013 - 2018, in Villa Clara. Methods: descriptive and cross-sectional study with 50 Candida genus isolates in blood cultures of patients hospitalized at Mariana Grajales Hospital (Neonatology Service) and José Luis Miranda Hospital (Intensive Care Service), Villa Clara, from January 2013 to September 2018. Descriptive and inferential statistics using Pearson's chi-squared test (χ2) or Fisher's exact test to the variables: year of study, type of hospital, type of service and isolated Candida species. Results: the largest isolates of invasive candidiasis corresponded to the Intensive Therapy service from the pediatric hospital in 2018 (only with statistical significance). In this same hospital, the Candida spp group obtained the highest index, followed by Candida tropicalis, without statistical significance. The largest number of isolates corresponded to Candida spp in the Neonatology service, followed by Candida guillermondii, both without statistical significance. Conclusions: the Intensive Therapy service was the one with the highest number of cases of invasive candidiasis and the year 2018 was the most representative. The group of Candida spp was the most isolated species in both hospitals.

Candidiasis sistémica en pacientes críticos, factores predictores de riesgo / Systemic candidiasis in critical patients: risk predictors

Candida sp. constituye el microorganismo más frecuentemente implicado en las infecciones por hongos en pacientes críticamente enfermos. La candidemia es la forma más común de candidiasis invasiva, ingresando al torrente sanguíneo por el tracto gastrointestinal y la piel. A nivel mundial la candidemia se destaca como una de las principales causas de morbilidad con aumentos significativos en la incidencia y prevalencia en los últimos años. Además, eleva los costos de la atención hospitalaria. Aunque diversos estudios demuestran que el inicio temprano del tratamiento antifúngico mejora el pronóstico de los pacientes, se tienen dificultades con las pruebas diagnósticas existentes, debido a que no tienen un nivel adecuado de sensibilidad y un óptimo rendimiento. Por tal razón, en la actualidad se vienen utilizando diversos índices clínicos predictores de candidiasis invasiva como Ostrosky, Candida Score, Escala de Pittet, entre otros, los cuales tienen un alto valor predictivo negativo que permite reconocer los pacientes que no se benefician de un inicio temprano de un tratamiento antifúngico mientras se confirma el diagnóstico por laboratorio. La terapia antifúngica disponible para el tratamiento de las candidemias en UCI está compuesta básicamente por tres grupos de medicamentos, los azoles, los polienos y las equinocandinas. A pesar de la validación de los índices predictores de candidiasis invasiva en otros países, se desconoce cuál de estos sería el más efectivo para predecir esta patología en la región

Candida sp. is the microorganism most frequently involved in fungal infections in critically ill patients. Candidemia is the most common form of invasive candidiasis entering the bloodstream from the gastrointestinal tract and skin. Worldwide candidemia stands out as one of the leading causes of morbidity with significant increases in its incidence and prevalence in recent years. In addition, it raises the costs of hospital care. Although several studies show that early initiation of antifungal treatment improves patients' prognosis, there are difficulties with existing diagnostic tests, because they do not have an adequate level of sensitivity and optimum performance. For this reason, various clinical indices are currently being used as predictors of invasive candidiasis, such as Ostrosky Candida Score, Candida Score, Pittet Candida Colonization Index, among others, which have a high negative predictive value that allows to recognize patients who do not benefit from an early initiation of an antifungal treatment while the diagnosis is confirmed by laboratory. Antifungal therapy available for the treatment of candidemia in the ICU consists basically of three groups of drugs: azoles, polyenes and echinocandins. Despite the validation of predictors of invasive candidiasis in other countries, it is still unknown which of these would be the most effective for predicting this disease in the region

EPICO 4.0. 'Total quality' in the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients by analysing the integrated process.

BACKGROUND: A high quality integrated process in the clinical setting of non-neutropenic critically ill patients at risk for invasive candidiasis is a necessary tool to improve the management of these patients. AIMS: To identify the key points on invasive candidiasis in order to develop a set of recommendations with a high level of consensus required for the creation of a total quality integrated process for the management of non-neutropenic critically ill patients at risk of invasive candidiasis. METHODS: After a thorough review of the literature of the previous five years, a Spanish prospective questionnaire, which measured consensus by the Delphi technique, was anonymously conducted by e-mail, including 31 national multidisciplinary experts with extensive experience in invasive fungal infections, from six national scientific societies. The experts included a specialist in intensive care medicine, anesthetists, microbiologists, pharmacologists, and specialists in infectious diseases that responded 27 questions prepared by the coordination group. The educational objectives considered six processes that included knowledge of the local epidemiology, the creation and development of multidisciplinary teams, the definitions of the process, protocols, and indicators (KPI), an educational phase, hospital implementation, and the measurement of outcomes. The level of agreement among experts in each category to be selected should exceed 70%. In a second phase, after drawing up the recommendations of the selected processes, a face to face meeting with more than 60 specialists was held. The specialists were asked to validate the pre-selected recommendations. MEASURES AND MAIN OUTCOMES: Firstly, 20 recommendations from all the sections were pre-selected: Knowledge of local epidemiology (3 recommendations), creation and development of multidisciplinary teams (3), definition of the process, protocols and indicators (1), educational phase (3), hospital implementation (3), and measurement of outcomes (7). After the second phase, 18 recommendations were validated, and it was concluded that the minimum team or core necessary for the development of an efficient program in the use of antifungal drugs in non-neutropenic critically ill patients must consist of a specialist in infectious diseases, a clinical pharmacist, a microbiologist, a specialist in intensive care medicine, a specialist in anesthesia and recovery, and an administrator or member of the medical management team, and, in order to be cost-effective, it should be implemented in hospitals with over 200 beds. In addition, it is recommended to apply a consensual check list for the evaluation of the diagnostic process and treatment of invasive candidiasis in patients that have started an antifungal treatment. The management of external knowledge and individual learning stand out as active educational strategies. The main strategies for measuring patient safety outcomes are the analysis of the results achieved, and learning activities; assess, review and refine the deployment of the processes; quality control; epidemiological surveillance and applied research; benchmarking; and basic research. The results of the integrated process should be annually disseminated outside the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing the management of invasive candidiasis requires the application of the knowledge and skills detailed in our recommendations. These recommendations, based on the Delphi methodology, facilitate the creation of a total quality integrated process in critically-ill patients at risk for invasive candidiasis.

Incidencia y etiología de la candidiasis invasiva en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell / Incidence and etiology of invasive candidiasis in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of of the Pereira Rossell Hospital Center

Introducción: en los últimos años ha aumentado la incidencia de candidiasis invasiva (CI) a nivel mundial. En nuestro país no se disponen de estudios epidemiológicos sobre CI. El objetivo fue determinar incidencia de CI en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de Niños del Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell. Metodología: estudio descriptivo retrospectivo. Se incluyeron los niños con CI hospitalizados entre 1/1/2009-1/6/2014. A partir de los cultivos micológicos se identificaron las historias clínicas de los pacientes que desarrollaron CI. Se definió CI al aislamiento de Candida en algún sitio estéril. Se calcularon la densidad de incidencia y de prevalencia. Se registró motivo de ingreso y presencia de factores de riesgo para CI. Resultados: se identificaron 6 casos de CI, incidencia de 1,86 c/1000 ingresos. Los aislamientos se realizaron en hemocultivos (n=3) y líquido peritoneal (n=3). Las especies de Candida aisladas fueron C. albicans (n=3), C. parapsilosis (n=2) y C. tropicalis (n=1). Los factores de riesgo para CI presentes fueron dispositivos invasivos (n=6), antibióticos de amplio espectro (n=6), alimentación parenteral (n=5), cirugía abdominal(n=4). Todos los aislamientos fueron sensibles a los azoles. En 1 de las 6 CI se inició tratamiento empírico previo al aislamiento. Fallecieron 4 de los 6 pacientes. Discusión: la incidencia fue similar a otra experiencia realizada en cuidados intensivos pediátricos. Los pacientes que desarrollaron CI presentaron asociación de factores de riesgo. Los aislamientos fueron sensibles a fluconazol. Caracterizar a estos niños permitirá iniciar en forma oportuna el tratamiento antifúngico. Se destaca la importancia de desarrollar la vigilancia continua sobre las especies de Candida y su patrón de sensibilidad a los antifúngicos.

Introduction: invasive infections by Candida strains have increased around the world in the last years. There are no epidemiological studies on invasive candidiasis (IC) in Uruguay. The study aimed to find out the incidence of IC in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) at the Pereira Rossell Hospital Center (CHPR). Method: a retrospective and descriptive study was conducted. Children hospitalized in PICU of the CHPR between 1/1/2009 and 1/6/2014 were included in the study. The medical records of patients who developed IC were identified based on mycological cultures. Invasive candidiasis was defined as the isolation of the fungus in a sterile site. Incidence and prevalence density were calculated. Cause for hospitalization and risk factors for IC were recorded. Results: six cases of IC were identified and the incidence was of 1.86/1000 hospitalized children in PICU. Isolation of Candida was done in blood cultures (n=3) and peritoneal fluid (n=3). The species of Candida isolated were C. albicans (n=3), C.parapsilosis (n=2) and C. tropicalis (n=1). Risk factors for IC were identified in the 6 cases. Use of invasive prosthesis and a wide spectrum antibiotics were identified in the 6 cases, as well as parenteral nutrition (n=5) and abdominal surgery (n=4). All isolations of Candida were sensitive to fluconazole. Antifungal empiric treatment was started in one case prior to the isolation of Candida. Four out of six children died. Discussion: the incidence of IC found was similar to that in another study in a PICU. Children who developed IC presented several risk factors for IC. The 6 isolations of Candida were sensitive to fluconazole. Analyzing the clinical features of these children will allow the identification of patients with high risk of IC and to timely initiate antifungal treatment. It is necessary to maintain a continuous surveillance on Candida species and their sensitivity pattern to antifungal medication.

Impact of a multifaceted educational intervention including serious games to improve the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: Infections caused by Candida species are common in critically ill patients and contribute to significant morbidity and mortality. The EPICO Project (Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 studies) recently used a Delphi approach to elaborate guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of this condition in critically ill adult patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention based on the Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 recommendations. DESIGN: Specialists anonymously responded to two online surveys before and after a multifaceted educational intervention consisting of 60-min educational sessions, the distribution of slide kits and pocket guides with the recommendations, and an interactive virtual case presented at a teleconference and available for online consultation. SETTING: A total of 74 Spanish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Specialists of the Intensive Care Units in the participating hospitals. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Specialist knowledge and reported practices evaluated using a survey. The McNemar test was used to compare the responses in the pre- and post-intervention surveys. RESULTS: A total of 255 and 248 specialists completed both surveys, in both periods, respectively. The pre-intervention surveys showed many specialists to be unaware of the best approach for managing invasive candidiasis. After both educational interventions, specialist knowledge and reported practices were found to be more in line with nearly all the recommendations of the Epico 1 and Epico 2.0 guidelines, except as regards de-escalation from echinocandins to fluconazole in Candida glabrata infections (p=0.055), and the duration of antifungal treatment in both candidemia and peritoneal candidiasis. CONCLUSIONS: This multifaceted educational intervention based on the Epico Project recommendations improved specialist knowledge of the management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients.

EPICO 3.0. Management of non-neutropenic patients in medical wards.

BACKGROUND: Although the management of invasive fungal infection (IFI) has improved, a number of controversies persist regarding the approach to invasive fungal infection in non-neutropenic medical ward patients. AIMS: To identify the essential clinical knowledge to elaborate a set of recommendations with a high level of consensus necessary for the management of IFI in non-neutropenic medical ward patients. METHODS: A prospective, Spanish questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was anonymously answered and e-mailed by 30 multidisciplinary national experts, all specialists (intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases) in IFI and belonging to six scientific national societies. They responded to five questions prepared by the coordination group after a thorough review of the literature published in the last few years. For a category to be selected, the level of agreement among the experts in each category had to be equal to or greater than 70%. In a second round, 73 specialists attended a face-to-face meeting held after extracting the recommendations from the chosen topics, and validated the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm. RESULTS: The following recommendations were validated and included in the algorithm: 1. several elements were identified as risk factors for invasive candidiasis (IC) in non-hematologic medical patients; 2. no agreement on the use of the colonization index to decide whether prescribing an early antifungal treatment to stable patients (no shock), with sepsis and no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 3. agreement on the use of the Candida Score to decide whether prescribing early antifungal treatment to stable patients (no shock) with sepsis and no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 4. agreement on initiating early antifungal treatment in stable patients (no shock) with a colonization index>0.4, sepsis with no other evident focus and IC risk factors; 5. agreement on the performance of additional procedures in stable patients (no shock) with sepsis and no other evident focus, IC risk factors, without colonization index>0.4, but with a high degree of suspicion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the expert's recommendations, an algorithm for the management of non-neutropenic medical patients was constructed and validated. This algorithm may be useful to support bedside prescription.

EPICO 3.0. Recommendations on invasive candidiasis in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical patients with ICU extended stay.

BACKGROUND: Although in the last decade the management of invasive fungal infections has improved, a number of controversies persist regarding the management of complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical extended length-of-stay (LOS) patients in intensive care unit (ICU). AIMS: To identify the essential clinical knowledge and elaborate a set of recommendations, with a high level of consensus, necessary for the management of postsurgical patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection and surgical patients with ICU extended stay. METHODS: A Spanish prospective questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was anonymously answered and e-mailed by 30 multidisciplinary national experts, all of them specialists in fungal invasive infections from six scientific national societies; these experts were intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases. They answered 11 questions drafted by the coordination group after conducting a thorough review of the literature published in the last few years. For a category to be selected, the level of agreement among the experts in each should be equal to or greater than 70%. In a second round, 73 specialists attended a face-to-face meeting which was held after extracting recommendations from the chosen topics and in which they validated the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm. RESULTS: After the second Delphi round, the following 11 recommendations with high degree of consensus were validated. For "surgical patients" seven recommendations were validated: (1) risk factors for invasive candidiasis (IC), (2) usefulness of blood culture and direct examination of abdominal fluid to start empirical treatment; (3) PCR for treatment discontinuation; (4) start antifungal treatment in patients with anastomotic leaks; (5) usefulness of Candida score (CS) but not (6) the Dupont score for initiating antifungal therapy in the event of anastomotic leakage or tertiary peritonitis, and (7) the administration of echinocandins as first line treatment in this special population. For "surgical ICU extended LOS patients" four recommendations were validated: (1) risk factors for IC, (2) presence of multi-colonization by Candida as a required variable of the CS, (3) starting antifungal treatment with CS≥4, and (4) to perform non-culture-based microbiological techniques in stable septic patients without evident focus. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis and management of IC in ICU surgical patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations, based on the DELPHI methodology, may help to identify potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes.

Tuberculosis and fungal co-infection present in a previously healthy patient / Coinfección de tuberculosis y candidiasis pulmonar en paciente previamente sana

Background: The coexistance among fungal pathogens and tuberculosis pulmonary is a clinical condition that generally occurs in immunosuppressive patients, however, immunocompetent patients may have this condition less frequently. Objective: We report the case of an immunocompetent patient diagnosed with coinfection Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Candida albicans. Case Description: A female patient, who is a 22-years old, with fever and a new onset of hemoptysis. Clinical findings and diagnosis: PDiminished vesicular breath sounds in the apical region and basal crackling rales in the left lung base were found in the physical examination. Microbiological tests include: chest radiography and CAT scan pictograms in high resolution, Ziehl-Neelsen stain, growth medium for fungus and mycobacteria through Sabouraudís agar method with D-glucose. Medical examinations showed Candida albicans fungus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis present in the patient. Treatment and Outcome: Patient was treated with anti-tuberculosis and anti-fungal medications, which produced good responses. Clinical relevance: Pulmonary tuberculosis and fungal co-infection are not common in immunocompetent patients. However, we can suspect that there is a presence of these diseases by detecting new onset of hemoptysis in patients.

Antecedentes: La coexistencia entre los hongos patógenos y la tuberculosis pulmonar es una condición clínica que se produce generalmente en pacientes inmunosuprimidos, sin embargo, los pacientes inmunocompetentes puede tener esta condición con menor frecuencia. Objetivo: Presentamos el caso de un paciente inmunocompetente con diagnóstico de una coinfección de tuberculosis Mycobacterium tuberculosis y Candida albicans. Caso clínico: Paciente femenina de 22 años con cuadro abrupto de tos, fiebre y hemoptisis sin antecedentes de enfermedad. Hallazgos clínicos y métodos diagnósticos: Al examen respiratorio se halló disminución del murmullo vesicular en la región apical y estertores crepitantes basales en el pulmón izquierdo. Se realizó estudios microbiológicos de muestras tomadas por expectoración y por fibrobroncoscopia en el que se incluyó la tinción de Ziehl-Neelsen, cultivo para micobacteria y hongos en medio Agar Dextrosa Sabouraud y filamentización en suero obteniéndose positividad para Mycobacterium tuberculosis y Candida albicans. Tratamiento y resultado: Se le realizó manejo con antifímicos de primera categoría y antimicóticos con buena respuesta clínica. Relevancia clínica: La coinfección fúngica y tuberculosis pulmonar no es frecuente en pacientes inmunocompetentes, debe sospecharse en episodios abruptos de hemoptisis.

Risk factors for candidemia in non-neutropenic critical patients in Colombia.

OBJECTIVES: Due to the increase in isolation of Candida spp. in critically ill patients, and the high mortality and economic costs which this infection entails, a study was made of the risk factors associated to candidemia in critically ill patients from 7 intensive care units in Colombia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter matched case-control study was conducted in 7 intensive care units of 3 university hospitals. Data on overall length of hospital stay (including both general wards and the intensive care unit) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 243 subjects (81 cases and 162 controls) between January 2008 and December 2012 were included. In order of frequency, C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis were isolated. The main identified risk factors were: overall length of hospital stay>25 days (OR 5.33, 95% CI 2.6-10.9), use of meropenem (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.86-7.5), abdominal surgery (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.39-6.06) and hemodialysis (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.5-7.7). No differences in mortality between patients with candidemia and controls were found (39.5 vs. 36.5%, respectively, P=.66) were found. CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, a long hospital stay, abdominal surgery, the use of meropenem and hemodialysis were identified as risk factors for candidemia.

Indicación de nuevos antimicóticos en pacientes con candidiasis invasiva / Prescription of new antifungal drugs in patients with invasive candidiasis

Las infecciones micóticas invasivas han alcanzado tal importante diseminación en las unidades de cuidados intensivos, que hoy constituyen la cuarta causa de infecciones adquiridas en este servicio, con una mortalidad de hasta 50 por ciento. La inmunodepresión propia del paciente en estado crítico, unido a la aplicación de determinados procedimientos traumáticos -- catéteres, sondas, endoscopias, ventilación, intervenciones quirúrgicas abdominales, nutrición parenteral, entre otros --, predisponen a la infección. Al respecto, se está empleando una gama de nuevos antimicóticos (triazoles y equiniocandinas) en el tratamiento de pacientes con micosis invasivas, sobre la base de que la creación de protocolos terapéuticos puede disminuir el índice de mortalidad por dichas afecciones(AU)

The invasive fungal infections have reached such an important dissemination in the intensive care units that today they constitute the fourth cause of acquired infections in this service, with a mortality of up to 50 percent. The immunodepression characteristic of the patient in critical state, together to the application of certain traumatic procedures -- catheters, probes, endoscopies, ventilation, abdominal surgical interventions, parenteral nutrition, among other --, predispose to the infection. In this respect, a range of new antifungal drugs are being used (triazoles and equiniocandines) in the treatment of patients with invasive mycosis, on the base that the creation of therapeutic protocols can decrease the mortality index caused by these disorders(AU)

EPICO 2.0 project. Development of educational therapeutic recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in critically ill adult patients in special situations.

BACKGROUND: Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, still controversial issues remain, especially in different therapeutic critical care scenarios. AIMS: We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis for antifungal treatment in special situations and different scenarios. METHODS: Second prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique, conducted anonymously by electronic e-mail in the first phase to 23 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious disease specialists, answering 30 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned four categories, including peritoneal candidiasis, immunocompromised patients, special situations, and organ failures. The agreement among panelists in each item should be higher than 75% to be selected. In a second phase, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a meeting was held with more than 60 specialists in a second round invited to validate the preselected recommendations. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the first phase, 15 recommendations were preselected (peritoneal candidiasis (3), immunocompromised patients (6), special situations (3), and organ failures (3)). After the second round the following 13 were validated: Peritoneal candidiasis (3): Source control and early adequate antifungal treatment is mandatory; empirical antifungal treatment is recommended in secondary nosocomial peritonitis with Candida spp. colonization risk factors and in tertiary peritonitis. Immunocompromised patients (5): consider hepatotoxicity and interactions before starting antifungal treatment with azoles in transplanted patients; treat candidemia in neutropenic adult patients with antifungal drugs at least 14 days after the first blood culture negative and until normalization of neutrophils is achieved. Caspofungin, if needed, is the echinocandin with most scientific evidence to treat candidemia in neutropenic adult patients; caspofungin is also the first choice drug to treat febrile candidemia; in neutropenic patients with candidemia remove catheter. Special situations (2): in moderate hepatocellular failure, patients with invasive candidiasis use echinocandins (preferably low doses of anidulafungin and caspofungin) and try to avoid azoles; in case of possible interactions review all the drugs involved and preferably use anidulafungin. Organ failures (3): echinocandins are the safest antifungal drugs; reconsider the use of azoles in patients under renal replacement therapy; all of the echinocandins to treat patients under continuous renal replacement therapy are accepted and do not require dosage adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires a broad range of knowledge and skills as summarized in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to optimize the therapeutic management of these patients in special situations and different scenarios and improve their outcome based on the DELPHI methodology.

ÉPICO project. Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. AIMS: We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis. METHODS: A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations. RESULTS: In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores. CONCLUSIONS: The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

Épico Project. Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. AIMS: We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis. METHODS: A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations. RESULTS: In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores. CONCLUSIONS: The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

[Épico project: Development of educational recommendations using the DELPHI technique on invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill adult patients. Grupo Proyecto Épico]. / Proyecto Épico: formulación de unas recomendaciones educativas con metodología DELPHI para pacientes adultos críticos no neutropénicos y con candidiasis invasiva.

BACKGROUND: Although there has been an improved management of invasive candidiasis in the last decade, controversial issues still remain, especially in the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. AIMS: We sought to identify the core clinical knowledge and to achieve high level agreement recommendations required to care for critically ill adult patients with invasive candidiasis. METHODS: A prospective Spanish survey reaching consensus by the DELPHI technique was made. It was anonymously conducted by electronic mail in a first term to 25 national multidisciplinary experts in invasive fungal infections from five national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthesiologists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and infectious diseases specialists, who answered to 47 questions prepared by a coordination group after a strict review of the literature in the last five years. The educational objectives spanned five categories, including epidemiology, diagnostic tools, prediction rules, and treatment and de-escalation approaches. The level of agreement achieved among the panel experts in each item should exceed 75% to be selected. In a second term, after extracting recommendations from the selected items, a face to face meeting was performed where more than 80 specialists in a second round were invited to validate the preselected recommendations. RESULTS: In the first term, 20 recommendations were preselected (Epidemiology 4, Scores 3, Diagnostic tools 4, Treatment 6 and De-escalation approaches 3). After the second round, the following 12 were validated: (1) Epidemiology (2 recommendations): think about candidiasis in your Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and do not forget that non-Candida albicans-Candida species also exist. (2) Diagnostic tools (4 recommendations): blood cultures should be performed under suspicion every 2-3 days and, if positive, every 3 days until obtaining the first negative result. Obtain sterile fluid and tissue, if possible (direct examination of the sample is important). Use non-culture based methods as microbiological tools, whenever possible. Determination of antifungal susceptibility is mandatory. (3) Scores (1 recommendation): as screening tool, use the Candida Score and determine multicolonization in high risk patients. (4) Treatment (4 recommendations): start early. Choose echinocandins. Withdraw any central venous catheter. Fundoscopy is needed. (5) De-escalation (1 recommendation): only applied when knowing susceptibility determinations and after 3 days of clinical stability. The higher rate of agreement was achieved in the optimization of microbiological tools and the withdrawal of the catheter, whereas the lower rate corresponded to de-escalation therapy and the use of scores. CONCLUSIONS: The management of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients requires the application of a broad range of knowledge and skills that we summarize in our recommendations. These recommendations may help to identify the potential patients, standardize their global management and improve their outcomes, based on the DELPHI methodology.

[Candida peritonitis: Prevalence and risk factors]. / Candidiasis peritoneal: prevalencia y factores de riesgo.

BACKGROUND: A peritoneal fluid with a positive culture for Candida in patients with associated clinical symptoms enables peritoneal candidiasis (PC) to be diagnosed. This etiology is related to a poor prognosis, thus, it is important to know all the risk factors and to start early an empirical treatment. The risk factors associated with this kind of peritonitis are to receive prolonged antibiotic treatment, nosocomial infection, female gender, involvement of the upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) tract, and the ocurrence of an intraoperative cardiovascular failure (CVF). AIMS: The principal aim was to determine the prevalence of PC in our hospital, and the secondary aims to determine the associated risk factors. METHODS: We obtained samples from 74 patients diagnosed with peritonitis, consecutively from 2007 to 2010. Cultures were performed with the free peritoneal fluid aspirated during surgery. RESULTS: The prevalence of PC obtained in our hospital was 17.6%, from which 46.15% corresponded to Candida albicans. The involvement of the UGI tract and the onset of CVF can be considered risk factors for the development of this pathology. Age, gender, nosocomial infection and previous antibiotic treatment were not related to this pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Our prevalence of PC is 17.6%. The risk factors that could predispose are the involvement of the UGI tract as the cause of peritonitis, and CVF during surgical procedure.